The product

7 specialists read your manuscript. You get one letter.

Each reviewer looks for something different, works in parallel, and pairs every issue it finds with the fix. The Editor-in-Chief then turns eight opinions into one prioritized decision.

Get free assessment See a sample report

Upload

The manuscript, plus tables and figures as separate files if you have them. Nothing is charged yet.

The panel reads it

Up to 7 specialists work in parallel. You watch each one finish and can open its report the moment it does.

Decision letter

Major versus minor revisions, prioritized, every issue paired with a concrete fix and an explanation of why.

The panel

Buy the full panel, a four-reviewer core, or any single specialist. Each one is priced by the depth of work it does.

Statistical Methods

DEEPEST PASS

Test selection, assumption violations, power, and interpretation. Returns corrective code in R, Python, or Stata.

Your paired t-test assumes normality. Consider Wilcoxon signed-rank given n=12, with corrective R code.

Domain Expert

LITERATURE

Literature gaps, outdated citations, novelty assessment, and competing findings in your specific field.

Three recent RCTs directly contradict your stated hypothesis. These should be addressed in your Discussion.

Results Accuracy

ARITHMETIC

Recomputes what you report. Tables against narrative, incomplete outcome reporting, numbers that do not add up.

Table 3 reports n=245 but the sum of subgroup ns is 243. This discrepancy should be resolved before submission.

Adversarial Skeptic

INFERENCE

Unsupported conclusions, causal claims from observational data, logical gaps between sections, missing limitations.

Causal language in the Conclusion is not supported by an observational design.

Systematic Reviewer

STANDARDS

Study design, inclusion criteria, confounding, and reproducibility. Checks CONSORT, PRISMA, and STROBE compliance.

Inclusion criteria are not stated. STROBE items 6a and 12a are unaddressed.

Pragmatic Reviewer

SIGNIFICANCE

Whether the finding matters in practice, and whether a broader audience can follow why.

The clinical relevance of a 0.3-point change is never established for the reader.

Scientific & Technical Writer

CLARITY

Clarity, grammar, terminology consistency, and journal style adherence.

Three competing terms describe the same construct across Methods and Results.

Editor-in-Chief

CONSOLIDATION

Weighs every reviewer against the others and issues one decision letter with major and minor revisions separated.

Major revision. Four issues must be resolved before resubmission, six are minor.

What you can upload

The manuscript as PDF, Word, or LaTeX. Tables and figures as separate files, CSV, Excel, PNG, JPEG, TIFF, analysed at no extra cost. Up to 25 MB per file.

Journal articlesPhD dissertationsMaster's thesesConference papersPreprintsGrant proposalsBook chaptersMeta-analyses

What it will not do

It does not write or rewrite your manuscript. It identifies weaknesses so you can address them yourself.

It does not replace journal peer review. It is the pass you make before an editor sees the work.

It does not keep your files. Uploads are deleted after 30 days and never used for training.

Find out what a reviewer would say.

Your price appears before you pay. No subscription.

Get free assessment

Or see what it costs