Strengthen your work before it reachesreviewers, committees, or editors
Comprehensive, multi-perspective feedback on methodology, statistics, writing, and domain relevance — for journal papers, dissertations, theses, conference papers, and more. Delivered in minutes, not months.
Validated against peer reviews from BMJ — a top-tier medical journal →
Who It's For
Whether you're preparing a journal submission, defending a dissertation, or posting a preprint — get expert feedback tailored to your work.
Journal Authors
Catch statistical errors, methodology gaps, and writing issues that lead to desk rejection.
PhD Candidates
Strengthen your dissertation before your defense. Get thorough feedback your advisor may not have time to give.
Master's Students
Submit a polished thesis with confidence. Identify weaknesses before your committee sees them.
Conference Presenters
Tight deadline? Get detailed feedback on your conference paper or abstract in minutes.
Preprint Authors
Quality-check your work before posting publicly to arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, or SSRN.
Book Chapter Contributors
Make sure your chapter meets the volume's standards before submitting to the editor.
What Your Review Covers
Seven specialist reviewers examine your work from different angles, then an Editor-in-Chief consolidates everything into a clear revision roadmap.
Statistical Methods
Wrong test selection, misinterpreted results, missing effect sizes — with corrective code in R, Python, or Stata
Methodology & Design
Threats to validity, missing controls, CONSORT/PRISMA/STROBE reporting gaps
Domain Relevance
Literature gaps, outdated citations, novelty assessment, missed competing findings
Results Accuracy
Table/figure inconsistencies, calculation errors, data that doesn't add up
Argumentation & Logic
Unsupported conclusions, causal claims from observational data, alternative explanations
Writing Quality
Clarity, grammar, terminology consistency, journal style adherence
Editorial Summary
Consolidated decision letter with prioritized major vs. minor revision guidance
Example feedback from real reviews:
Your use of a paired t-test assumes normality — consider Wilcoxon signed-rank given your sample size of n=12. Here is corrective R code...
Table 3 reports n=245 but the sum of subgroup ns is 243. This discrepancy should be resolved before submission.
Three recent RCTs (2023–2024) directly contradict your stated hypothesis — these should be addressed in your Discussion.
How It Works
Upload Your Work
PDF or Word. Journal articles, dissertations, theses, conference papers, preprints, and more. You can also upload figures and tables separately.
Choose Your Review Depth
Standard (4 specialists) or Premier (7 specialists + editorial summary). Or build a custom panel by selecting individual reviewers.
Get Your Review
Comprehensive feedback delivered in minutes, typically 5–15 minutes. Track progress in real time as each specialist completes their analysis.
Tested Against Real Journal Peer Reviews
In a preliminary analysis of 5 manuscripts published in The BMJ (2021–2023), PeerGenius reviews were compared against journal peer reviews using a 10-dimensional scoring framework.
8.86/10
Review Quality Score
4 of 5
Near-Parity
64.2%
Complementarity
PeerGenius reviews are designed to complement — not replace — traditional peer review. Our reviewers caught issues that journal reviewers missed, and vice versa.
Designed to Strengthen the Peer Review Process
PeerGenius provides pre-submission feedback — the same kind of review you'd get from a knowledgeable colleague, a writing center, or a statistical consultant.
Many journals and funding agencies encourage authors to seek feedback before submission.
PeerGenius does not write, rewrite, or generate text for your manuscript — it identifies weaknesses so you can address them yourself.
Your manuscript is processed securely, automatically deleted after 30 days, and never used for training or any other purpose.
Simple, Pay-Per-Review Pricing
Pricing scales with your document length — shorter papers cost less.
Upload your manuscript for instant, personalized pricing.
Standard Review
from $9.06
typical 8,000-word paper · priced by length
4 specialist reviewers
- Domain expertise + adversarial critique
- Statistical methods with corrective code
- Results accuracy verification
- PDF export included
Premier Review
from $14.84
typical 8,000-word paper · priced by length
7 specialist reviewers + Editor
- All 7 specialized reviewers
- Editor-in-Chief consolidation
- Comprehensive decision letter
- PDF export included
Individual reviewers also available · Build your own review panel
Ready to Strengthen Your Work Before Submission?
Upload your manuscript, dissertation, or thesis and get expert feedback in minutes.